Kyari, Malami at loggerheads over court processes in fraud case

Kyari, Malami at loggerheads over court processes in fraud case

Suspended DCP Abba Kyari on Thursday, June 2, told a Federal High Court, Abuja that the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF)’s response to his counter affidavit was an abuse of court process.

Abba Kyari, in a notice of preliminary objection marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/249/2022 dated and filed on May 19 by Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN, before Justice Inyang Ekwo, said the AGF’s reply was filed out of time and without leave of court first sought and obtained.

According to Agabi, Order 4 Rule 3 of the Extradition Act (Modification Order, 2014 & Federal High Court (Extradition Proceedings) Rules, 2015 specify that; “..upon being served with the counter affidavit of the fugitive, the applicant may file a reply on point of law within 48 hours.’’

Also Read: Atiku seeks Wike, Saraki’s support to defeat “callous” APC in 2023 polls

The senior lawyer argued that the AGF, who was the applicant, did not file a reply; but a further and better affidavit.

“The applicant’s further and better affidavit has no iota of law supporting it.

“The further and better affidavit filed by the applicant is incompetent and ought to be struck out,” he said.

In a written address in support, Agabi stressed that the AGF defied the rules of the court by not filing their response within stipulated time,

He said: “By the counter affidavit dated the 6th April, 2022 filed by the respondent (Abba Kyari); the applicant (AGF) ought to have filed their reply on point of law on the 8th April, 2022 as provided by the rules; but the applicant went extra miles to wait until 19th April, 2022 before they filed their further and better affidavit.

“Consequently, the further and better affidavit having no backing of law, constitute an abuse of court process and liable to be dismissed,” citing previous cases to back the submission.

When the matter was called on Thursday, Nureni Jimoh, SAN, who appeared for Abba Kyari, informed that he had an application; seeking for leave to file a further affidavit to the AGF’s response to their preliminary objection which they had earlier countered.

Jimoh said a copy of the further affidavit had been served on Pius Akutah, counsel for the AGF.

Akutah, who acknowledged the service of the further affidavit on him, opposed Jimoh’s move; to seek court leave to allow him filed the further affidavit.

He described the action as an attempt to attack their own counter affidavit filed against the motion.

But Justice Ekwo ordered Kyari’s lawyer to move the application.

Justice Ekwo adjourned the matter until June 3 (Friday) to allow the AGF’s lawyer filed a reply to Kyari’s preliminary objection; ordering all processes to be filed and served for all the applications to be heard on the adjourned date.

The Federal Government had sought for Kyari’s extradition to the United States (U.S) to answer a case over his alleged linked with the fraudster, Ramon Abbas, aka Hushpuppi.

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.