Omo-Agege details reason behind NASS’s opposition to electronic transmission of election results

Omo-Agege details reason behind NASS’s opposition to electronic transmission of election results

The Deputy Senate President, Senator Ovie Omo-Agege, on Friday, July 16, disclosed the reason behind the opposition of the National Assembly to the electronic transmission of election results.

According to Omo-Agege, the nation cannot go for such measures with only 43 per cent internet coverage.

He said the 9th Senate is fully in support of electronic voting and electronic transmission of results; but argued that the nation could not go into it following the current percentage of internet coverage; until the Nigerian Communication Commission (NCC) can ascertain otherwise.

Omo-Agege made this disclosure on Friday, July 16, during a press briefing after delivering a keynote address titled, “Nigeria’s Democratic Experience Since 1999: The Imperative of Reforming The Electoral Process” during the 16th convocation ceremony of Benson Idahosa University, Benin.

Also Read: NBC cautions broadcasters against glamourising terrorists’ activities in news reports

“The 9th Senate is fully in support of electronic voting and transmission of results.

“If we adopt electronic transmission for the 43 per cent, what happens to the rest 57 per cent?”

“The country has to wait for the approval of the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) to adopt electronic transmission of the result.”

Speaking on electoral reforms, he said regardless of the source, electoral offences perpetrated by officials of the Electoral Management Bodies (EMBs); and officials of political parties, candidates, and voters must be tackled to safeguard the sanctity of the electoral process of the nation.

Omo-Agege explained that another obvious challenge in the election; is what has been described as the judicialization of Nigeria’s electoral process.

“The Courts rather than members of the political parties or the electorate as the case may be; determine winners of party primaries and elections even when the evidence runs to the contrary. This is eroding citizens’ confidence in the electoral process”

He noted that he was not questioning the role of the Courts since electoral justice; and the adjudicatory process are recognized as parts and parcel of the electoral process.

“However, the widespread perception that the judiciary lacks independence from the executive; and that people pay for judicial outcomes that advance their personal and group interests; raises a question mark about the legitimacy of some elected public officials.”

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *