A Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday, December 2; adjourned until December 5, judgment in a N7.2 billion fraud case against former Gov. Orji Kalu of Abia.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) prosecuted Orji Kalu and a former Commissioner for Finance in the state, Ude Udeogo.
Also charged along with Kalu is a company, Slok Nig. Ltd.
The judgement could not be delivered on Monday (Dec. 2) as earlier slated; as Justice Mohammed Idris was not available.
The EFCC had on Oct. 31, 2016, preferred a 34-count charge against the defendants.
The charge was later increased to 39 counts.
The defendants, however, pleaded not guilty to all the counts and were granted bail.
On Oct. 22, both the prosecution and defence counsel adopted their written submissions before the court.
The judge then reserved judgement now to be delivered on Dec. 5.
It was reported that on Nov. 12, 2018, Kalu was absent for his trial. This was after being absent on a previously adjourned date – Nov. 5, 2018.
Although defence counsel informed the court that he was away for medical treatment in Germany; the court revoked his bail and ordered that at his return to Nigeria.
In the charge, the EFCC said that the defendants committed the alleged offences; between August 2001 and October 2005.
It said that Orji Kalu utilised his company’s account to retain N200 million in First Inland bank (now First City Monument Bank).
The commission claimed that the sum formed part of funds illegally derived from the coffers of the Abia State Government.
In one of the counts, Kalu’s company (Slok Nig. Ltd.) and one Emeka Abone said to be at large; were alleged to have retained in the company’s account; the sum of N200 million on behalf of the ex-governor.
In counts one to 10, the defendants were alleged to have retained about N2.5 billion belonging to the Abia.
The EFCC said that the defendants diverted over N7.2 billion from Abia government’s treasury during Kalu’s tenure as the governor; in contravention of Sections 15(6), 16 and 21 of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2005.
The commission said that the offences also contravene the provisions of the Money Laundering Act of 1995 as amended.